CURRENT EVENT

Palestinians submit UN statehood bid[1]

By AMY TEIBEL and MOHAMMED DARAGHMEH - Associated Press | AP – 23 September 2011

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Defying U.S. and Israeli opposition, Palestinians asked the United Nations on Friday to accept them as a member state, sidestepping nearly two decades of failed negotiations in the hope this dramatic move on the world stage would reenergize their quest for an independent homeland.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas was greeted by sustained applause and appreciative whistles from the delegations in the General Assembly hall as outlined his people's hopes and dreams of becoming a full member of the United Nations. Some members of the Israeli delegation, including Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, left the hall as Abbas approached the podium.

 

In a scathing denunciation of Israel's settlement policy, Abbas declared that negotiations with Israel "will be meaningless" as long as it continues building on lands the Palestinians claim for that state. Invoking what would be a nightmare for Israel, he went so far as to warn that his government could collapse if the construction persists. "This policy is responsible for the continued failure of the successive international attempts to salvage the peace process," said Abbas, who has refused to negotiate until the construction stops. "This settlement policy threatens to also undermine the structure of the Palestinian National Authority and even end its existence."

 

To another round of applause, he held up a copy of the formal membership application and said he had asked U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon to expedite deliberation of his request to have the United Nations recognize a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem. Shortly after, Ban announced that he had referred the application to the Security Council, where it is expected to founder under the weight of U.S. opposition and a possible veto. Action on the membership request could take weeks, if not months.

 

The speech papered over any Palestinian culpability for the negotiations stalemate, deadly violence against Israel, spurned peace offers and the internal rift that has produced dueling governments in the West Bank and Gaza. It also ignored Jewish links to the Holy Land.

 

Abbas' jubilant mood was matched by the exuberant celebration of thousands of Palestinians who thronged around outdoor screens in town squares across the West Bank on Friday to see their president submit his historic request for recognition of a state of Palestine to the United Nations. "I am with the president," said Muayad Taha, a 36-year-old physician, who brought his two children, ages 7 and 10, to witness the moment. "After the failure of all other methods (to win independence) we reached a stage of desperation. This is a good attempt to put the Palestinian cause and the Palestinian people on the map. Everyone is here to stand behind the leadership."

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, addressing the General Assembly shortly after Abbas, said his country was "willing to make painful compromises." "I extend my hand to the Palestinian people, with whom we seek a just and lasting peace," Netanyahu said, to extended applause. Palestinians, he added, "should live in a free state of their own, but they should be ready for compromise" and "start taking Israel's security concerns seriously." Netanyahu opposes negotiations based on 1967 lines, saying a return to those frontiers would expose Israel's heartland to rocket fire from the West Bank.

 

To be sure, Abbas' appeal to the U.N. to recognize an independent Palestine would not deliver any immediate changes on the ground: Israel would remain an occupying force in the West Bank and east Jerusalem and continue to severely restrict access to Gaza, ruled by Palestinian Hamas militants. The strategy also put the Palestinians in direct confrontation with the U.S., which has threatened to veto their membership bid in the Council, reasoning, like Israel, that statehood can only be achieved through direct negotiations between the parties to end the long and bloody conflict.

 

Also hanging heavy in the air was the threat of renewed violence over frustrated Palestinian aspirations, in spite of Abbas' vow — perceived by Israeli security officials as genuine — to prevent Palestinian violence. The death on Friday of 35-year-old Issam Badram, in gunfire that erupted after rampaging Jewish settlers destroyed trees in a Palestinian grove, was the type of incident that both Palestinians and Israelis had feared would spark widespread violence.

 

Yet by seeking approval at a world forum overwhelmingly sympathetic to their quest, Palestinians hope to make it harder for Israel to resist already heavy global pressure to negotiate the borders of a future Palestine based on lines Israel held before capturing the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza in 1967. "We extend our hands to the Israeli government and the Israeli people for peacemaking," Abbas said. "Let us build the bridges of dialogue instead of checkpoints and walls of separation, and build cooperative relations based on parity and equity between two neighboring states — Palestine and Israel — instead of policies of occupation, settlement, war and eliminating the other," he said.

 

It was not clear how serious Abbas was about his very public threat to dissolve his limited self-rule government, born of the landmark accords Israel and the Palestinians signed in the 1990s. Dissolution would put 150,000 Palestinians out of work and cause utter chaos. Israel, which is skeptical of such talk, would be saddled with the welfare and policing of 2.5 million unwanted Palestinian subjects. Palestinians say they turned to the U.N. in desperation over 18 failed years of peace talks. They say they decided to reinvigorate their flagging statehood campaign by bringing it to the broadest possible international forum — the United Nations — in the hope an enhanced world status would pressure Israel to act more boldly. Netanyahu insists his commitment to peacemaking is genuine and accuses the Palestinians of going to the U.N. specifically to avoid negotiations.

 

In recent weeks, international mediators have been furiously trying to piece together a formula that would let the Palestinians abandon their plan to ask the Security Council for full U.N. membership, and instead make do with asking a sympathetic General Assembly to elevate their status from permanent observer to nonmember observer state. With Council approval unlikely, they are expected to exercise that option, which, while more modest, would still be seen as valuable to the Palestinians because of the implicit recognition of the pre-1967 borders. It also would give the Palestinians access to international judicial bodies such as the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court, which Israel fears would target them unfairly.

 

The U.S. and Israel have also been pressuring Council members to either vote against the plan or abstain when it comes up for a vote. The vote would require the support of nine of the Council's 15 members to pass, but even if the Palestinians could line up that backing, a U.S. veto is assured. Efforts to stymie the U.N. move have been accompanied by a regalvanized international bid to get talks moving again, but the resumption of negotiations seems an elusive goal, with both sides digging in to positions that have tripped up negotiations for years. Israel insists that negotiations go ahead without any preconditions. But Palestinians say they will not return to the bargaining table without assurances that Israel would halt settlement building and drop its opposition to basing negotiations on the borders it held before the 1967 Mideast war.

 

Talks for all intents and purposes broke down nearly three years ago after Israel went to war in the Gaza Strip and prepared to hold national elections that ultimately propelled Netanyahu to power for a second time. A last round was launched a year ago, with the ambitious aim of producing a framework accord for a peace deal, but broke down just three weeks later after an Israeli settlement construction slowdown expired. From the General Assembly podium, Netanyahu repeated his offer to meet with Abbas on the sidelines of the U.N. session — an offer the Palestinian leader has rejected in the past.

 

COMMENTS:

“The land, moreover, shall not be sold permanently, for the land is Mine; for you are but aliens and sojourners with Me.” – Leviticus 25:23

 



[1] http://news.yahoo.com/palestinians-submit-un-statehood-bid-155612081.html

CURRENT EVENTS

 

From Vezot Ha'brecha

1.    Everest tour plane crash kills all 19 on board

(very short comments)

2.    Brain Dead? Doctors Said Yes, Patients Proved Otherwise

(very short comments)

 

Everest tour plane crash kills all 19 on board[1]

By Deepak Adhikari | AFP – 25 September 2011

A small plane taking tourists on a sightseeing trip around Mount Everest crashed into a hillside near the Nepalese capital Kathmandu on Sunday, killing all 19 people on board. The Buddha Air Beechcraft plane, carrying 10 Indians, two Americans, one Japanese citizen and three local passengers, came down in heavy rain and fog at Godavari, about 10 kilometres (six miles) from Kathmandu. The three Nepalese crew also died in the accident as the plane smashed into wooded slopes, leaving the fuselage broken into several pieces. "All 19 people have died. The Buddha Air-103 was returning from a mountain flight when it crashed into Kotdada Hill," Bimlesh Lal Karna, head of the rescue department at Tribhuwan International Airport, told AFP.

 

Police spokesman Binod Singh said one person initially survived the crash but died in hospital. "The rescue efforts have been hampered by heavy rain," he added, confirming the nationalities of the passengers.

Airport authorities on the ground lost contact with the plane at 7:30 am and it crashed minutes later. "When we reached the crash site, we found the dead bodies scattered within 25 metres (yards) of the site which is surrounded by trees," Dip Shamsher Rana, a police officer who took part in the rescue, told AFP.

"The nearest road is 50 metres away. There were mangled remains of the aircraft which was broken into several pieces." Witnesses told local television stations how the plane burst into flames on impact. "The plane was flying very low. We were surprised. It crashed into the hill and there was a huge explosion," one man told the Avenues Television news channel.

 

Investigators scouring the accident site found the black box flight recorder several hours after the crash, and police said a probe was underway to establish the cause of the accident. Buddha Air, a private airline based in Kathmandu, said it had initiated an internal investigation into the crash. "We are deeply grieved by this unimaginable and unfortunate incident and pray for eternal peace of the departed souls," the airline said. The company offers a 8,240 rupee ($140) "Everest Experience" package, taking tourists from Kathmandu and flying them around the world's tallest mountain and surrounding peaks. The Buddha Air website describes the Beechcraft as the "safest plane operating in the domestic sector".

 

COMMENTS:

Beloved, can you imagine a U.S. Flagged Airline, or a European airline, even acknowledging in a press release that the passengers and crew killed had eternal souls and wishing them eternal peace? If you have never been to Nepal – it is a pagan country. There are faux-gods and rituals everywhere. And yet even these people are aware: 1). of a soul, 2). of an afterlife, and 3). that there can be a pleasant or unpleasant experience in the afterlife. Modern Hellenized Western Nations don’t even want to admit “officially” that there is a soul or eternity: punishment or blessing.

 

Imagine if a PR Spokesperson for a major airline acknowledged these things in a press conference after an accident with a major loss of life? The airline would be swift to correct the previous statements; making apologies to the families of all faiths that the spokesperson stated his/her own beliefs and does not reflect the views of the airline. Everyone once in a while you will see a snippet of an acknowledgement by a policeman at an accident or a firefighter at a tragic fire – that there is a God and people DO have souls.

 

Maybe if more Believers would state the obvious – it would begin to resonate with people who do not know God or His Son? But that would entail being loyal to the message of the Gospel as Paul did on Mars Hill, or as Stephen did: and it might entail being reprimanded by ones employer; but be praised by God.

 

Brain Dead? Doctors Said Yes, Patients Proved Otherwise[2]

Organ Donations in the Spotlight

By Carol Bengle Gilbert | Yahoo! Contributor Network – Fri, Sep 23, 2011

Recent cases of people being declared brain dead, then recovering contradict what doctors and organ procurement groups having been telling the public since 1968. "Brain dead is dead. There is no 'recovery,'" one organ procurement organization says on its website. It's a familiar refrain, but one that savvy medical consumers would do well to investigate before agreeing to become organ donors.

 

The "Dead" Awaken

In July, a woman diagnosed as "brain dead" did the supposedly impossible. Madeleine Gauron woke up. Transplant folks had already sought consent to harvest her organs, but fortunately for her, her family refused, demanding proof she was really dead. That case follows on the heels of a similar "miracle" in Australia in March. Doctors declared Gloria Cruz, 56, brain dead. She regained consciousness three days later. Lydia Paillard revived after a diagnosis of brain death in October. Sebastien Paillard was considering consenting to turning off his mother's ventilator at the doctor's recommendation when staff members noticed signs of brain activity in the "dead" woman. Three woman in a single year, first they were irrevocably dead, and then they weren't. Before them, there was Zack Dunlap.

 

Zack Dunlap, Brain Dead or Living?

Zack Dunlap was declared brain dead in 2008. Organ harvesters were at the ready and actually began the process, according to NeuroLogica. An impulsive decision by Dunlap's cousin to make a final check of his vital signs saved his life. After his ordeal, Dunlap remembered being declared brain dead and feeling "ticked off" at the doctor, he told the TODAY Show. But the hospital treating Dunlap insists he was really dead, according to the Toronto Star. Dr. Leo Mercer said there was no blood flow to Zack's brain, therefore, "He was dead. He (met) the legal, medical requirements for declaring a patient brain dead." Dr. Steven Novella analyzed the Dunlap case based on media reports for NeuroLogica. He found the diagnosis timing problematic. Dunlap suffered trauma to the brain and was declared brain dead 36 hours later. Novella says that swelling during that period would interfere with accurate diagnosis.

 

Problems with Brain Death Standard

An ad hoc committee of Harvard doctors introduced brain death in 1968. Their push for the adoption of this new legal standard for determining death was significantly motivated by a desire to increase the supply of organs for transplantDoctors Truog and Miller recognized a distinction between legal death and actual death when they posited in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2008 that the standard is unconvincing because many patients declared brain dead retain some essential neurological function. "Many will object that transplant surgeons cannot legally or ethically remove vital organs from patients before death, since doing so will cause their death. However, if the critiques of the current methods of diagnosing death are correct, then such actions are already taking place on a routine basis," those doctors argue. Truog and Miller advocate a new standard allowing for explicit organ harvesting from living patients when the death is imminent due to ventilator removal plans.

 

Brain Death Determinations in Practice

Doctors are not consistent in declaring brain deaths. "Determining Brain Death," published by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses in 1999, cited a study demonstrating that only 35% of 165 doctors likely to have to assess brain death could accurately describe the legal standard. Only 42% were consistent in applying their concept of death. So were Dunlap, Gauron, Cruz and Paillard victims of mistaken diagnoses? Or were they "brain dead" yet still alive and capable of recovery? To medical consumers, it may not matter. Either way, if you're a potential organ donor, you could end up giving someone else the gift of life with the sacrifice of your own.

 

COMMENT:He who does not love abides in death.” – I John 3:14. How many times does the world say this is truth or fact…and it turns out to not be the case? If “A Brave New World” is inevitable: to which do you wish to be a citizen in: a world run by carnal men and women or one run by God? (Isaiah 11:1-16).



[1] http://news.yahoo.com/nepal-plane-crash-kills-18-airport-officials-051732255.html

[2] http://news.yahoo.com/brain-dead-doctors-said-yes-patients-proved-otherwise-221600587.html   In the original story online there are several embedded links to the news stories and studies that the author references.